Alirocumab: 13 agencies, 2015–2026

This page collects every recorded health technology assessment decision for one molecule across the agencies in our archive, and compares them. The comparison is the point: each agency publishes its own verdict, none publishes how that verdict sits against the others.

What the record shows

Where alirocumab met resistance it was usually narrowed rather than refused: 12 of 27 decisive outcomes were recommendations with restrictions, against 7 outright refusals.

HAS (France) has been harder on alirocumab than on its own caseload: it refused 4 of 7 decisive submissions here (57%), against a base rate of 11% across everything it has assessed.

Assessment has run over 10.8 years, from 18 Aug 2015 at AWMSG (Wales) to 10 Jun 2026 at HAS (France).

PBAC (Australia) changed its position: not recommended in 2017, recommended by 2023, after a resubmission.

Every one of the eight highest-volume agencies in this archive has a record for alirocumab.

Not every gap is a refusal: for alirocumab, 1 submission was never made and 1 was withdrawn or terminated before a decision — an outcome set by the company rather than the assessor.

The file is active: 10 of 37 records date from 2023 or later.

The programme is broad: 8 distinct indication wordings are recorded for alirocumab by the agencies that label one in English (AWMSG, NICE, PBAC and SMC).

6 of these 37 records carry a year of decision but no day, so any interval quoted here is approximate to within a year.

AWMSG (Wales) was first to assess alirocumab, on 18 Aug 2015; CIPM (Spain) did not open a file until 19 Jun 2024 — an unusually long tail of 8.8 years between the earliest and latest system to look at it.

The record arrives in waves: 11 separate years each carry two or more decisions, spread across 12 years in total.

Restriction is doing real work here: 12 of 27 decisive outcomes narrowed alirocumab to a subgroup rather than accepting or refusing it outright, at AOTMIT (Poland), NICE (England) and PHARMAC (New Zealand) among others.

7 of the 13 agencies here assessed alirocumab more than once, HAS (France) most often at 8 entries — repeat review is the norm for this molecule rather than the exception.

alirocumab has been through 13 of the 18 agencies in this archive — among the most widely assessed molecules on file.

The full ledger for alirocumab reads 12 restricted, 8 recommended, 7 not recommended and 4 no benefit, with 6 in other categories.

Decisions on file

AgencyDateIndication as recorded OutcomeSource
HAS (France)10 Jun 2026Listing (Transparency Committee)ASMR Vsource
AOTMIT (Poland)25 Jul 2025programu lekowego B.101. „Leczenie pacjentów z zaburzeniami lipidowymi (ICD-10: E78.01, I21, I22, I25)not recommendedsource
PBAC (Australia)2025Familial heterozygous hypercholesterolaemiaNon-familial hypercholesterolaemiaThe PBAC rescinded the March 2023 recommendation for this drug.source
TLV (Sweden)20 Sep 2024Praluent får utökad subventionrestricted subsidysource
CIPM (Spain)19 Jun 2024Indicaciones terapéuticas autorizadas: Hipercolesterolemia primaria y dislipemia mixta Praluent está indicado en adultos…financed by the SNS · art. 92 a, csource

32 further decisions for alirocumab, across 12 agencies, are not shown here. They include the most recent record on file, 10 Jun 2026 from HAS (France); its outcome is in the subscriber dataset. They link to 21 further source documents.

Related molecules

Coverage: 37 decisions for alirocumab from 13 agencies, 2015 to 2026. Data to 7 Sep 2026. ATC class C10A — Lipid modifying agents. How this page is produced. Compiled by Altima Partners; queries: sales@altimapartners.co.uk.

Request the full decision record