Pertuzumab: where the agencies disagree

This page collects every recorded health technology assessment decision for one molecule across the agencies in our archive, and compares them. The comparison is the point: each agency publishes its own verdict, none publishes how that verdict sits against the others.

What the record shows

CONITEC (Brazil), DMC (Denmark) and G-BA (Germany), among others, recommended or restricted pertuzumab, while CIPM (Spain) did not recommend it.

On the same population the two systems disagree outright: SMC (Scotland) recorded restricted for “In combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast c…”, while PBAC (Australia) recorded not recommended for “Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC)”.

The file has been open for more than a decade: 12.9 years separate the first record, 16 May 2013 at AWMSG (Wales), from the most recent, 29 Apr 2026 at DMC (Denmark).

NYE METODER (Norway) changed its position: not recommended on 13 Nov 2016, recommended by 16 Jun 2019, after a resubmission.

No assessment is on file from TLV (Sweden), which is among the eight highest-volume agencies here.

The file is active: 4 of 32 records date from 2023 or later.

The programme is broad: 12 distinct indication wordings are recorded for pertuzumab by the agencies that label one in English (AWMSG, NICE, PBAC and SMC).

5 of these 32 records carry a year of decision but no day, so any interval quoted here is approximate to within a year.

AWMSG (Wales) was first to assess pertuzumab, on 16 May 2013; DMC (Denmark) did not open a file until 29 Apr 2026 — an unusually long tail of 12.9 years between the earliest and latest system to look at it.

The record arrives in waves: 7 separate years each carry two or more decisions, spread across 13 years in total.

9 of the 13 agencies here assessed pertuzumab more than once, PBAC (Australia) most often at 5 entries — repeat review is the norm for this molecule rather than the exception.

pertuzumab has been through 13 of the 18 agencies in this archive — among the most widely assessed molecules on file.

The full ledger for pertuzumab reads 12 recommended, 10 not recommended, 3 restricted and 2 other, with 5 in other categories.

Decisions on file

AgencyDateIndication as recorded OutcomeSource
PBAC (Australia)2025Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage breast cancerRecommendedsource
PHARMAC (New Zealand)21 Jul 2023Breast cancer, HER2-positive, locally advanced, inflammatory or early-stage, neoadjuvant treatmentPTAC advice: No Formal Recommendationsource
CIPM (Spain)5 May 2022Indicaciones terapéuticas autorizadas: Cáncer de mama precoz Perjeta está indicado en combinación con trastuzumab y quim…not financed by the SNS · art. 92 c, dsource
ZIN (Netherlands)11 May 2021Pakketadvies sluisgeneesmiddel pertuzumab en trastuzumab (Phesgo®) bij borstkankeradvice published (sluis)source
G-BA (Germany)18 Feb 2016Perjeta — benefit assessment §35aadded benefit: not provensource

27 further decisions for pertuzumab, across 12 agencies, are not shown here. They include the most recent record on file, 29 Apr 2026 from DMC (Denmark); its outcome is in the subscriber dataset. They link to 21 further source documents.

Related molecules

Coverage: 32 decisions for pertuzumab from 13 agencies, 2013 to 2026. Data to 7 Sep 2026. ATC class L01F — Antineoplastics. How this page is produced. Compiled by Altima Partners; queries: sales@altimapartners.co.uk.

Request the full decision record